| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Fancy Candy
Good Names All Gone
1
   |
Posted - 2017.02.18 08:55:34 -
[1] - Quote
Nearly every weapon upgrade system has a faction and/or even Officer version to it.
Missile Guidance Computer and Enhancer are still new (in eve time scale).
Wouldn't it be a good option to introduce higher Meta versions of these ?
Currently there is only T1 , Compact, and T2 for booth.
Which seems a little dissapoiting ... cause "options"
The typical increases in effectivness is already a well know calculation for CCP.
Benefits:
More fitting options
More LP Store Items
Indirect buff for Missile ships
Drawbacks:
Maybe edge cases on Phoenix and Leviathan against Subcaps (cant calculate it, so its only a speculation)
Problems:
Dev worktime (and we know that's the most valuable resource in Eve - and possibly the reason these aren't existing already)
Are there any things that slipped my mind, i'm happy to learn new things :) |
Fancy Candy
Good Names All Gone
1
|
Posted - 2017.02.18 09:07:34 -
[2] - Quote
i am sorry maybe i got missunderstood.
I didnt ask for more options between T1 and T2.
I was suggesting Faction and Officer versions.
Meta mods above T2.
Caldary Navy, Domination, Republic Fleet, Officer |
Fancy Candy
Good Names All Gone
1
|
Posted - 2017.02.18 11:11:28 -
[3] - Quote
The Faction goods are already "produced" from the players
- or kind of produced with the LP Store .. which are good cause ISK sinks.
And if Officer Mods should be changed to BPC drops -- thats something CCP should decide.
But that would not hinder them to bring these Mods.
It wouldnt stop or hinder CCP to "move more to Produce".
They only would need to change the Mods Dropping to BPC dropping ... that change could still be made. |
Fancy Candy
Good Names All Gone
1
|
Posted - 2017.02.18 15:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
@Lugh Crow-Slave:
Sorry what ?
How should a modul that helps for Missiles DPS application or/and Range be a NERF ?
You maybe should explain your worries, indstead of posting twice "its a nerf" and hope for someone to catch onto the phrase.
It would speed up the process and clears possibly missunderstandings faster (from booth sides)
|
Fancy Candy
Good Names All Gone
1
|
Posted - 2017.02.18 17:34:47 -
[5] - Quote
so "please no better mods" cause the existing would need to be nerfed to introduce these ?
I would like to see and learn how close these are to be OP.
Is it cause of the Caldari Dread/Titan High angel weapons ?
Please explain/show so i can understand and learn.
That would help to refine the idea and show flaws/edge cases which would occure.
Or render it completly usless cause of gamebraking mechanics.
Personal note:
In my personal use (HAM,CM,Torp) it had a very positiv impact using a single precision or range scripted MGC.
I had to trade Tank/Resists - with adapting fits (were fitting alows it) i got a realy good improvment.
If i wouldnt use the MGC i would stil have the same DPS-application as infront of the Agis release. (except HM which received +5% Basedamage) |
| |
|